Reasonable Disagreements

by Hoover Institution
119

Hoover fellows Richard Epstein and Adam White discuss major legal and policy issues and debate points of disagreement between their libertarian and conservative perspectives.

More
Recent Episodes
  • To Forgive and Forget?
    Sep 8, 2022 – 47:46
  • Reasonable Searches and Seizures?
    Aug 18, 2022 – 46:15
  • Hearing the Worst of It
    Mar 28, 2022 – 45:38
  • The Supreme Court’s Historic Year Keeps Getting More Interesting
    Jan 26, 2022 – 44:55
  • Standing Disagreements
    Dec 16, 2021 – 45:34
  • From Mandates to Prohibitions, and Everything in Between
    Nov 9, 2021 – 44:18
  • The Podcast Is Back in Session and so is the Supreme Court
    Oct 11, 2021 – 44:03
  • You Say Goodbye, I Say Hello
    Jan 21, 2021 – 58:04
  • After the Riot
    Jan 8, 2021 – 40:26
  • A Nominal Administration
    Dec 11, 2020 – 40:48
  • Court in Disaster
    Dec 1, 2020 – 50:06
  • Poll Positions
    Nov 16, 2020 – 55:49
  • Truth and Justice
    Oct 19, 2020 – 43:02
  • An Appointment With History
    Sep 22, 2020 – 34:54
  • What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
    Sep 8, 2020 – 35:26
  • Administrative States: From TikTok, to Law & Order, to Covid-19
    Aug 24, 2020 – 45:44
  • Constitutional Conflicts in DC and Beyond
    Jul 22, 2020 – 44:40
  • Prosecutions and Precautions
    May 20, 2020 – 47:54
  • Coronavirus and an Essay that Went Viral
    Apr 2, 2020 – 47:23
  • Socially Distant: Richard and Adam disagree about COVID-19
    Mar 23, 2020 – 47:32
  • Coronavirus, the Constitution, and the CFPB
    Mar 10, 2020 – 45:12
  • Trying Times in the Senate
    Jan 31, 2020 – 01:01:40
  • The End of the Year; The Start of an Impeachment Trial
    Dec 16, 2019 – 56:03
  • Judicial Legitimacy and Proposals to Restructure the Supreme Court
    Nov 7, 2019 – 46:07
  • Impeachment, and What Trump Meant
    Oct 3, 2019 – 41:02
  • In Defense of Classical Liberalism (Among Other Things)
    Jun 19, 2019 – 43:18
  • Constitutional Conflicts With Congress and the Supreme Court
    May 23, 2019 – 46:41
  • The Barr Hearings and the Further Decline of Congress
    May 3, 2019 – 46:21
  • As Baseball Winds Up, Mueller Winds Down
    Mar 28, 2019 – 41:34
  • Warren and Holder Want to Break Tech and the Supreme Court
    Mar 13, 2019 – 49:35
  • A Great Attorney General Pick, Barr None
    Feb 6, 2019 – 52:06
  • The Rule of Law and Other People’s Money
    Feb 6, 2019 – 39:00
  • From Marshall to Mueller
    Dec 13, 2018 – 43:21
  • An Appointment With Controversy
    Nov 12, 2018 – 38:33
  • Should the Senate’s Confirmation Process Change?
    Oct 24, 2018 – 33:27
  • Confirming Kavanaugh
    Sep 12, 2018 – 45:13
  • A Special Day for the Special Counsel
    Aug 22, 2018 – 47:40
  • Will Judge Kavanaugh Change the Supreme Court?
    Jul 25, 2018 – 30:25
  • Pardon Me? A Trump-Mueller Discussion
    Jun 13, 2018 – 40:37
  • Trade-War Debate: Richard Epstein vs Adam White
    May 23, 2018 – 37:15
  • Mend It or End It? - The Environmental Regulations of Infrastructure
    May 2, 2018 – 31:42
  • Mulling the Mueller Investigation
    Apr 11, 2018 – 32:26
  • Hoover Institution fellows Richard Epstein and Adam White discuss and analyze the top legal issues of the day from an academic perspective
    Mar 19, 2018 – 26:44
Recent Reviews
  • Bernagh
    Epstein always a treat
    It’s always informative and entertaining to listen to Richard Epstein. His debating partner here is not of same caliber but he does a creditable job nonetheless.
  • dennis.karpf
    Wonderful Legal Analysis
    Superb legal and constitutional discourse from a logical and policy perspective which outdistances any other legal podcast. Keep up the great work.
  • Gnatsperish
    Great Debates Between Two Great Minds
    I really enjoy listening to Adam White and Richard Epstein debate the hot topics of today. They both are clearly experts in the legal field and I enjoy that they don't always agree, but are always respectful towards each other. This is an insightful podcast that I enjoy listening to whenever new episodes are released.
  • dgim
    Unreasonable prejudice !
    Tremendous hypocrisy by these 2 so-called legal experts... They describe the highly biased and unethical ‘witch hunt’ that is clearly being perpetrated by the extremely prejudiced and conflicted Mueller probe against the Trump presidency and deny that it is exactly that! They inexplicably and inexcusably give Hillary’s thousands of well defined and documented yet ignored felonies and give her a total pass “as that would be political”. Their antiTrump animus and judicial prejudice is totally inexcusable and puts them squarely in the swampy mess of protecting their ‘tenured’ status and reputations for personally protective selfishness...to hell sigh justice and the future of the presidency! This episode does not deserve a one star!
Similar Podcasts
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork on this page are property of the podcast owner, and not endorsed by UP.audio.